I stumbled across this
blog this morning. First actually, I stumbled across
this one, and thought his bit about
Swearing like an Englishman was brilliant. So, intrigued, I checked out his profile, finding myself at the aforementioned
Kosher Salmon.
This second blog also started out by interesting me. "People like to understand things", he begins, and then proceeds to talk about how we are all so quick to ask what people do, so that we can categorize them in our heads and make it easier for us to understand them. He then moved on into a bit about how, for kids, we even were silly enough to ask "what do you want to be when you grow up?", as if they didn't have better things to think about. All in all I thought it was a relevant train of thought. Why is it that we are so eager to categorize people? Couldn't there be a better way of dealing with those around us?
...but the way the train of thought went. ...I dunno...I was very abrubtly left behind (perhaps on purpose?--my Irish blood wasn't meant to understand?).
He went into a bit about love, as the reason we get up in the morning. ...which I had to agree with. Then (here's where it took a turn for the 'padg is lost'), he talked about love meaning preferance. About how love was about choosing something and holding it up above something else.
?...My concept of love is so differant from that. My concept of love is as a force of energy that flows through all of us inspiring us to live. It seems to me that it's only when we haven't learned to let love out in its unbridled form that we find ourselves dividing and handing it out selectively. The most virtuous goal, seems to me, to be that of learning to love every grain of the world, and the people in it, with an equally strong passion.
?...but he said that "those who want everyone to love everyone and everything the same wish nothing more that the removal of all love from this world", and that confused me. I put alot of thought into it, and I still came out pretty sure that I did not wish the removal of all love from this world.
Then he said "if you’re willing to die for Israel as much as you are for
Kamchatka, then you’re not willing to die for anything of value, you’re just willing to die", and I thought: 'wait? die for Isreal? Die for a country?....that's love? k...see now I'm really lost'.
...anyway, I guess, at this point, you've either read the Kosher Salmon blog, or put together his point. To summarize, the main idea was that being Jewish means you are part of a religion "equal to or greater than any other", and that that made you special...and that you should celebrate that by being actively Jewish. You should be proud, you should do the whole
birthright thing. ...etc. etc.
The levels at which I've been confused at this point are staggering.
First of all, we are definately labelling and categorizing people again (which I thought was what we were trying to get away from). That is definately my smallest complaint, so I'll leave it at that for now.
Secondly, dying for Isreal? Can we talk for a moment about nationalism? Can we talk about the atrociousness of the World Wars?
When I met exchange students from Europe when I was abroad in Japan, we often talked about flags. In Japan, you do not often see flags flying. For those North Americans among us, this was a little surprising, but the Europeans quickly brought us up to speed on the fact that for countries actively involved in WWII flags had become a little bit of a 'taboo'. Nationalism had become a bit of a 'no-no'. ...and rightly so wouldn't you agree? I mean that was allllllot of blood spilt over the concept of being Aryan, or Japanese, as the case may have been. And forgive me if it's politically incorrect of me to say so, but shouldn't Jewish people know this better than anyone else?
Thirdly, love being expressed through death? This is completely foriegn to me. I understand that there are situations in which you must fight for what you believe, and that such fights could lead to your death...but surely that is differant from love? In what circumstance could love and death really be equated? I mean there are those among us who believe that Jesus' death was the ultimate expression of God's love for us....but even in that (very extreme) example, I would have to argue that Jesus' death was much less about love, and much more about a bunch of angry and confused Romans and Jews.
...and actually, now that Jesus is on the table, I'd like to use him for another point. Jesus was Jewish. 2000 years ago, he grew up learning all the things that you learned back in the day in Jewish culture, and he mulled it over and went: "Hey guys! I have a thought. We're all God's children. Let's love everyone as children of God". Two millenia ago it occured to him that maybe it wasn't the greatest idea in the world to be dividing people into sections and labelling them. ....and yet, 2 millenia later what are we doing? Dividing people, and labelling them. Infact he even gets a bunch of labels of his own (I'm sure he'd be realllly impressed by that too).
Guys. It's the year 2005. Globalization is making the world smaller than it has ever been. Whether we like it or not, we (all of us) are going to have to start to learn to work together. The population is still growing dramatically, the environment is suffering from the unreasonable pressure the mal-developed nations puts on it, people are starving and dying. ...we have alot of important things to deal with...and we have to do it together.
The fact of the matter is: the future is scary. And God knows if we're going to get it right (all the puns you can make with that sentance are valid). All that is clear is that there's no where to go but forwards. Now that a place like North America exists, where languages, and cultures blend together, now that you can fly around the world in less than a day...now that it's easier for me to get a hold of family in Ireland, than my brother 45 minutes out of town...we just can't pretend to be segregated into little groups anymore. There is alot to be learned from history, and we certainly shouldn't be turning our backs on our cultures and ignoring them--but we can't go back. It just isn't one of the options on the table.
"Be proud that you’re not the same as everyone else, because if everyone was the same there could be no selection, no love," the guy said to Jews reading his blog. And I'm thinking, 'I'm all for embracing your background, and being aware of your culture...but the time has come to acknowledge what we all have in common...what it is to be human, and to learn to love everyone for that'.
I believe in a really powerful love, through which people's eyes could be opened to understanding one another. I believe that if we work together we could discover that starvation and hunger are unnecessary and that every human being, of every colour, in every culture, and of every religious tradition is equally deserving of a happy and comfortable life, through which they can explore their own potential.
Most importantly I believe that we are all God's children, all "chosen people", all worthy of enlightenment....that every one of us has the unquenchable energy of life and love flowing through our veins, and that no matter how much we choose to divide ourselves, and no matter how many times we die trying to prove otherwise, that that truth will ring clear over and over again.
...if you're with me on any of those points...let's move forward together eh?